[Intel-gfx] [CI 15/21] drm/i915: Reorder i915_add_request to separate the phases better
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Sep 9 07:21:01 UTC 2016
Let's avoid mixing sealing the hardware commands for the request and
adding the request to the software tracking.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
index 074fc06ff488..a149310c82ce 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
@@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool flush_caches)
u32 reserved_tail;
int ret;
+ trace_i915_gem_request_add(request);
+
/*
* To ensure that this call will not fail, space for its emissions
* should already have been reserved in the ring buffer. Let the ring
@@ -517,20 +519,6 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool flush_caches)
WARN(ret, "engine->emit_flush() failed: %d!\n", ret);
}
- trace_i915_gem_request_add(request);
-
- /* Seal the request and mark it as pending execution. Note that
- * we may inspect this state, without holding any locks, during
- * hangcheck. Hence we apply the barrier to ensure that we do not
- * see a more recent value in the hws than we are tracking.
- */
- request->emitted_jiffies = jiffies;
- request->previous_seqno = engine->last_submitted_seqno;
- engine->last_submitted_seqno = request->fence.seqno;
- i915_gem_active_set(&engine->last_request, request);
- list_add_tail(&request->link, &engine->request_list);
- list_add_tail(&request->ring_link, &ring->request_list);
-
/* Record the position of the start of the breadcrumb so that
* should we detect the updated seqno part-way through the
* GPU processing the request, we never over-estimate the
@@ -551,6 +539,18 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool flush_caches)
"for adding the request (%d bytes)\n",
reserved_tail, ret);
+ /* Seal the request and mark it as pending execution. Note that
+ * we may inspect this state, without holding any locks, during
+ * hangcheck. Hence we apply the barrier to ensure that we do not
+ * see a more recent value in the hws than we are tracking.
+ */
+ request->emitted_jiffies = jiffies;
+ request->previous_seqno = engine->last_submitted_seqno;
+ engine->last_submitted_seqno = request->fence.seqno;
+ i915_gem_active_set(&engine->last_request, request);
+ list_add_tail(&request->link, &engine->request_list);
+ list_add_tail(&request->ring_link, &ring->request_list);
+
i915_gem_mark_busy(engine);
local_bh_disable();
--
2.9.3
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list