[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] SKL/KBL watermark fixes, v2

Zanoni, Paulo R paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com
Wed Sep 14 13:25:27 UTC 2016


Em Qua, 2016-09-14 às 12:34 +0300, Jani Nikula escreveu:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > Here's the series with the reviews implemented. There's a new
> > patch,
> > based on the additional issue spotted by Lyude.
> 
> There's a bunch of cc: stable patches mixed with non cc: stable
> patches
> in the series. Do the cc: stable fixes work and backport cleanly
> without
> the the other non cc: stable patches? If not, can you arrange the
> series
> to not depend on the other patches?

Yeah, my bad. I was just pasting the output of "dim fixes" without
considering this aspect. I think the best thing is probably to backport
everything to stable and hope it works, considering the current
complaints we're seeing about screen flickering on SKL. Agree?

I suppose I don't need to resend the series just for these new tags.
I'll add them when it's time to merge.

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks for all the reviews,
> > Paulo
> > 
> > Paulo Zanoni (9):
> >   drm/i915: SAGV is not SKL-only, so rename a few things
> >   drm/i915: introduce intel_has_sagv()
> >   drm/i915/kbl: KBL also needs to run the SAGV code
> >   drm/i915/gen9: fix the WaWmMemoryReadLatency implementation
> >   drm/i915/gen9: minimum scanlines for Y tile is not always 4
> >   drm/i915/gen9: fix plane_blocks_per_line on watermarks
> > calculations
> >   drm/i915/gen9: fix the watermark res_blocks value
> >   drm/i915/gen9: implement missing case for SKL watermarks
> > calculation
> >   drm/i915/gen9: fail the modeset instead of WARNing on unsuported
> >     config
> > 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      |  10 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |   9 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |   6 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> > ------------
> >  4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list