On 9/9/2016 10:44 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:21:37PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: >> + if (!intel_slpc_active(dev_priv)) >> + return -ENODEV; > Can we really say slpc is active without an slpc.vma? No. Will remove this check. > -Chris >