[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v5 13/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_producer_single_consumer
robert.foss at collabora.com
robert.foss at collabora.com
Thu Sep 15 18:40:18 UTC 2016
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com>
This subtest runs a single consumer thread and multiple producer thread that
are synchronized using multiple timelines.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric at engestrom.ch>
---
tests/sw_sync.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 139 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
index 9ec2dc2..1af9a6b 100644
--- a/tests/sw_sync.c
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -447,6 +447,142 @@ static void test_sync_multi_consumer_producer(void)
igt_assert_f(thread_ret == 0, "A sync thread reported failure.\n");
}
+static int test_mspc_wait_on_fence(int fence)
+{
+ int error, active;
+
+ do {
+ error = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ERROR);
+ igt_assert_f(error == 0, "Error occurred on fence\n");
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ } while (active);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct {
+ int iterations;
+ int threads;
+ int counter;
+ int cons_timeline;
+ int *prod_timeline;
+ pthread_mutex_t lock;
+} test_mpsc_data;
+
+static int mpsc_producer_thread(void *d)
+{
+ int id = (long)d;
+ int fence, i;
+ int *prod_timeline = test_mpsc_data.prod_timeline;
+ int cons_timeline = test_mpsc_data.cons_timeline;
+ int iterations = test_mpsc_data.iterations;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
+ fence = sw_sync_fence_create(cons_timeline, i);
+
+ /* Wait for the consumer to finish. Use alternate
+ * means of waiting on the fence
+ */
+ if ((iterations + id) % 8 != 0) {
+ igt_assert_f(sw_sync_wait(fence, -1) > 0,
+ "Failure waiting on fence\n");
+ } else {
+ igt_assert_f(test_mspc_wait_on_fence(fence) == 0,
+ "Failure waiting on fence\n");
+ }
+
+ /* Every producer increments the counter, the consumer
+ * checks and erases it
+ */
+ pthread_mutex_lock(&test_mpsc_data.lock);
+ test_mpsc_data.counter++;
+ pthread_mutex_unlock(&test_mpsc_data.lock);
+
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(prod_timeline[id], 1);
+ close(fence);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mpsc_consumer_thread(void)
+{
+ int fence, merged, tmp, it, i;
+ int *prod_timeline = test_mpsc_data.prod_timeline;
+ int cons_timeline = test_mpsc_data.cons_timeline;
+ int iterations = test_mpsc_data.iterations;
+ int n = test_mpsc_data.threads;
+
+ for (it = 1; it <= iterations; it++) {
+ fence = sw_sync_fence_create(prod_timeline[0], it);
+ for (i = 1; i < n; i++) {
+ tmp = sw_sync_fence_create(prod_timeline[i], it);
+ merged = sw_sync_merge(tmp, fence);
+ close(tmp);
+ close(fence);
+ fence = merged;
+ }
+
+ /* Make sure we see an increment from every producer thread.
+ * Vary the means by which we wait.
+ */
+ if (iterations % 8 != 0) {
+ igt_assert_f(sw_sync_wait(fence, -1) == 0,
+ "Producers did not increment as expected\n");
+ } else {
+ igt_assert_f(test_mspc_wait_on_fence(fence) == 0,
+ "Failure waiting on fence\n");
+ }
+
+ igt_assert_f(test_mpsc_data.counter == n * it,
+ "Counter value mismatch\n");
+
+ /* Release the producer threads */
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(cons_timeline, 1);
+ close(fence);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* IMPORTANT NOTE: if you see this test failing on your system, it may be
+ * due to a shortage of file descriptors. Please ensure your system has
+ * a sensible limit for this test to finish correctly.
+ */
+static void test_sync_multi_producer_single_consumer(void)
+{
+ int iterations = 1 << 12;
+ int n = 5;
+ int prod_timeline[n];
+ int cons_timeline;
+ pthread_t threads[n];
+ long i;
+
+ cons_timeline = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
+ prod_timeline[i] = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+
+ test_mpsc_data.prod_timeline = prod_timeline;
+ test_mpsc_data.cons_timeline = cons_timeline;
+ test_mpsc_data.iterations = iterations;
+ test_mpsc_data.threads = n;
+ test_mpsc_data.counter = 0;
+ pthread_mutex_init(&test_mpsc_data.lock, NULL);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ pthread_create(&threads[i], NULL, (void * (*)(void *))
+ mpsc_producer_thread,
+ (void *)i);
+ }
+
+ mpsc_consumer_thread();
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
+ pthread_join(threads[i], NULL);
+}
+
static void test_sync_random_merge(void)
{
int i, size, ret;
@@ -549,6 +685,9 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("sync_multi_consumer_producer")
test_sync_multi_consumer_producer();
+ igt_subtest("sync_multi_producer_single_consumer")
+ test_sync_multi_producer_single_consumer();
+
igt_subtest("sync_random_merge")
test_sync_random_merge();
}
--
2.9.3
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list