[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] DRM: i915: Fix random GPU hang, Bug 156851

Cheng Cao bobcaocheng at 163.com
Thu Sep 15 07:27:32 UTC 2016


Signed-off-by: Cheng Cao <bobcaocheng at 163.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c     |  6 ++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c  | 61 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h         |  6 ++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 20 ++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 7a30af7..0b05dd9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -2907,6 +2907,12 @@ static unsigned int gen8_get_total_gtt_size(u16 bdw_gmch_ctl)
 	if (bdw_gmch_ctl > 4)
 		bdw_gmch_ctl = 4;
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+	/* Limit 64b platforms to a 4GB GGTT */
+	/* DMA 4GB protection */
+	if (bdw_gmch_ctl > 8)
+		bdw_gmch_ctl = 8;
+#endif
 
 	return bdw_gmch_ctl << 20;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
index 66be299a1..da272ae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -352,47 +352,44 @@ static void gen8_get_stolen_reserved(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 				     unsigned long *base, unsigned long *size)
 {
 	uint32_t reg_val = I915_READ(GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED);
+	unsigned long stolen_top;
+	struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = &dev_priv->ggtt;
 
 	*base = reg_val & GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED_ADDR_MASK;
 
 	switch (reg_val & GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_SIZE_MASK) {
 	case GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_1M:
-		*size = 1024 * 1024;
+		*size = 1 << 10 << 10;
 		break;
 	case GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_2M:
-		*size = 2 * 1024 * 1024;
+		*size = 2 << 10 << 10;
 		break;
 	case GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_4M:
-		*size = 4 * 1024 * 1024;
+		*size = 4 << 10 << 10;
 		break;
 	case GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_8M:
-		*size = 8 * 1024 * 1024;
+		*size = 8 << 10 << 10;
 		break;
 	default:
-		*size = 8 * 1024 * 1024;
-		MISSING_CASE(reg_val & GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_SIZE_MASK);
-	}
-}
-
-static void bdw_get_stolen_reserved(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
-				    unsigned long *base, unsigned long *size)
-{
-	struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = &dev_priv->ggtt;
-	uint32_t reg_val = I915_READ(GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED);
-	unsigned long stolen_top;
+		/* Whatever if it is a BDW device or SKL device
+		 * Or others devices..
+		 * This way is always going to work on 5th
+		 * generation Intel Processer
+		 */
+		stolen_top = dev_priv->mm.stolen_base + ggtt->stolen_size;
 
-	stolen_top = dev_priv->mm.stolen_base + ggtt->stolen_size;
+		*base = reg_val & GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED_ADDR_MASK;
 
-	*base = reg_val & GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED_ADDR_MASK;
+		/* MLIMIT - MBASE => PEG */
+		/*   -- mobile-5th-gen-core-family-datasheet-vol-2.pdf */
+		if (*base == 0) {
+			*size = 0;
+			MISSING_CASE(reg_val & GEN8_STOLEN_RESERVED_SIZE_MASK);
+		} else
+			*size = stolen_top - *base;
 
-	/* On these platforms, the register doesn't have a size field, so the
-	 * size is the distance between the base and the top of the stolen
-	 * memory. We also have the genuine case where base is zero and there's
-	 * nothing reserved. */
-	if (*base == 0)
-		*size = 0;
-	else
-		*size = stolen_top - *base;
+		break;
+	}
 }
 
 int i915_gem_init_stolen(struct drm_device *dev)
@@ -442,14 +439,14 @@ int i915_gem_init_stolen(struct drm_device *dev)
 		gen7_get_stolen_reserved(dev_priv, &reserved_base,
 					 &reserved_size);
 		break;
+	case 8:
+		gen8_get_stolen_reserved(dev_priv, &reserved_base,
+					 &reserved_size);
+		break;
 	default:
-		if (IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) ||
-		    IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_KABYLAKE(dev))
-			bdw_get_stolen_reserved(dev_priv, &reserved_base,
-						&reserved_size);
-		else
-			gen8_get_stolen_reserved(dev_priv, &reserved_base,
-						 &reserved_size);
+		// FIXME: This seemed like going to work
+		gen8_get_stolen_reserved(dev_priv, &reserved_base,
+				 &reserved_size);
 		break;
 	}
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index bf2cad3..3dce37b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -1748,6 +1748,12 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
 #define RING_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET(base)	_MMIO((base)+0x1c8) /* gen8+ */
 #define RING_CTX_TIMESTAMP(base)	_MMIO((base)+0x3a8) /* gen8+ */
 
+// 64 bit, low 32 preserved
+#define IOTLB_INVALID(base) _MMIO((base)+0x508 + 4) /* gen8+ */
+#define   IOTLB_INVALID_IVT (1<<31)
+#define   IOTLB_GLOBAL_INV_REQ (1<<28)
+#define   IOTLB_INVALID_IAIG (1<<25)
+
 #define ERROR_GEN6	_MMIO(0x40a0)
 #define GEN7_ERR_INT	_MMIO(0x44040)
 #define   ERR_INT_POISON		(1<<31)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 1d3161b..84dafcb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -498,7 +498,25 @@ static void intel_ring_setup_status_page(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	 * arises: do we still need this and if so how should we go about
 	 * invalidating the TLB?
 	 */
-	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7)) {
+	/* Respond to this question:
+	 *  According to mobile-5th-gen-core-family-datasheet-vol-2 from Intel
+	 *  There are registers for invalidation, set those registers will
+	 *  cause the hardware to perform IOTLB invalidation.
+	 */
+	if (IS_GEN8(dev_priv)) {
+		i915_reg_t reg = IOTLB_INVALID(engine->mmio_base);
+
+		/* ring should be idle before issuing a sync flush*/
+		WARN_ON((I915_READ_MODE(engine) & MODE_IDLE) == 0);
+
+		I915_WRITE(reg, 0x0 | IOTLB_INVALID_IVT | IOTLB_GLOBAL_INV_REQ);
+
+		if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
+					    reg, IOTLB_INVALID_IAIG, 0,
+					    1000))
+			DRM_ERROR("%s: wait for TLB invalidation timed out\n",
+				  engine->name);
+	} else	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6, 7)) {
 		i915_reg_t reg = RING_INSTPM(engine->mmio_base);
 
 		/* ring should be idle before issuing a sync flush*/
-- 
2.10.0




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list