[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/amdgpu: Remove call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait

[Daniel Vetter]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:08:24AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a
> timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not
> need to handle such conversion in the caller. The only challenge are
> those callers that wish to differentiate the error code between the
> nonblocking busy check and potentially blocking wait.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
> index 88fbed2389c0..a3e6f883ac2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
> @@ -407,10 +407,8 @@ int amdgpu_gem_wait_idle_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  	}
>  	robj = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(gobj);
> -	if (timeout == 0)
> -		ret = reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(robj->tbo.resv, true);
> -	else
> -		ret = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(robj->tbo.resv, true, true, timeout);
> +	ret = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(robj->tbo.resv, true, true,
> +						  timeout);
>  
>  	/* ret == 0 means not signaled,
>  	 * ret > 0 means signaled
> -- 
> 2.9.3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch