[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Use binary search when looking for shadowed registers
Joonas Lahtinen
joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com
Fri Sep 30 07:54:10 UTC 2016
On to, 2016-09-29 at 16:35 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> +static int mmio_reg_cmp(const void *key, const void *elt)
+ {
<SNIP>
>
> + if (offset < i915_mmio_reg_offset(*reg))
> + return -1;
> + else if (offset > i915_mmio_reg_offset(*reg))
> + return 1;
> + else
> + return 0;
I was about to suggest return a - b; but then realized it might
overflow. After a bit of searching, that is done in
regcache_default_cmp though. So not sure if it's a bug in there or did
I miss something. This is safe way at least.
> static bool is_gen8_shadowed(u32 offset)
> {
> > - int i;
> > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gen8_shadowed_regs); i++)
> > - if (offset == gen8_shadowed_regs[i].reg)
> > - return true;
> > + i915_reg_t *reg;
>
> > - return false;
> + reg = bsearch((void *)(unsigned long)offset,
(unsigned long) is not required, as we don't have sign bits to extend.
> + (const void *)gen8_shadowed_regs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(gen8_shadowed_regs),
> + sizeof(i915_reg_t),
> + mmio_reg_cmp);
> +
> + return reg ? true : false;
As I previously learnt, no need to explicitly convert bool types
anymore, so this can just be return bsearch(...);
With the last two fixed,
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list