[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Use the engine class to get the context size

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 05/04/2017 10:30, Oscar Mateo wrote:
> From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
>
> Technically speaking, the context size is per engine class, not per
> instance.

It is very nice to have the code match the documentation!

> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h |  7 ++++++-
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 0dc1cc4..6b1fc4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1908,8 +1908,10 @@ static void execlists_init_reg_state(u32 *regs,
>  }
>
>  /**
> - * intel_lr_context_size() - return the size of the context for an engine
> - * @engine: which engine to find the context size for
> + * intel_lr_class_context_size() - return the size of the context for a given
> + * engine class
> + * @dev_priv: i915 device private
> + * @class: which engine class to find the context size for
>   *
>   * Each engine may require a different amount of space for a context image,
>   * so when allocating (or copying) an image, this function can be used to
> @@ -1921,25 +1923,33 @@ static void execlists_init_reg_state(u32 *regs,
>   * in LRC mode, but does not include the "shared data page" used with
>   * GuC submission. The caller should account for this if using the GuC.
>   */
> -uint32_t intel_lr_context_size(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +uint32_t intel_lr_class_context_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +				     enum intel_engine_class class)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>
> -	WARN_ON(INTEL_GEN(engine->i915) < 8);
> +	WARN_ON(INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 8);
>
> -	switch (engine->id) {
> -	case RCS:
> -		if (INTEL_GEN(engine->i915) >= 9)
> +	switch (class) {
> +	case RENDER_CLASS:
> +		switch (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)) {
> +		default:
> +			DRM_ERROR("Unknown context size for GEN\n");

MISSING_CASE I think, otherwise it is too easy to miss in the noise. And 
it is MISSING_CASE for the class below which looks appropriate to me for 
this layer.

> +		case 9:
>  			ret = GEN9_LR_CONTEXT_RENDER_SIZE;
> -		else
> +			break;
> +		case 8:
>  			ret = GEN8_LR_CONTEXT_RENDER_SIZE;
> +			break;
> +		}
>  		break;
> -	case VCS:
> -	case BCS:
> -	case VECS:
> -	case VCS2:
> +	case VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS:
> +	case VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS:
> +	case COPY_ENGINE_CLASS:
>  		ret = GEN8_LR_CONTEXT_OTHER_SIZE;
>  		break;
> +	default:
> +		MISSING_CASE(class);
>  	}
>
>  	return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> index e8015e7..b3a4331 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> @@ -78,7 +78,12 @@ enum {
>  struct drm_i915_private;
>  struct i915_gem_context;
>
> -uint32_t intel_lr_context_size(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
> +uint32_t intel_lr_class_context_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +				     enum intel_engine_class class);
> +static inline uint32_t intel_lr_context_size(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +{
> +	return intel_lr_class_context_size(engine->i915, engine->class);
> +}
>
>  void intel_lr_context_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  uint64_t intel_lr_context_descriptor(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
>

Otherwise looks fine to me. I also really hope to be able to use the 
class/instance cleanup in scope of the better VCS load balancing which 
is currently being looked at.

Regards,

Tvrtko