[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use wait_for_register in lpt_reset_fdi_mphy()
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Apr 10 09:47:56 UTC 2017
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 08:53:25AM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> There is no need to use macros as we can use generic function.
> And we can save ~2000 bytes in driver footprint.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index b6b40cd..63f9dae4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -7697,22 +7697,30 @@ static void ironlake_init_pch_refclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> static void lpt_reset_fdi_mphy(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> + int ret;
> uint32_t tmp;
>
> tmp = I915_READ(SOUTH_CHICKEN2);
> tmp |= FDI_MPHY_IOSFSB_RESET_CTL;
> I915_WRITE(SOUTH_CHICKEN2, tmp);
>
> - if (wait_for_us(I915_READ(SOUTH_CHICKEN2) &
> - FDI_MPHY_IOSFSB_RESET_STATUS, 100))
> + ret = __intel_wait_for_register_fw(dev_priv,
> + SOUTH_CHICKEN2,
> + FDI_MPHY_IOSFSB_RESET_STATUS,
> + FDI_MPHY_IOSFSB_RESET_STATUS,
> + 100, 0, &tmp);
> + if (ret)
> DRM_ERROR("FDI mPHY reset assert timeout\n");
If we aren't using ret, and if the function remains neatly aligned I
would have just done
if ( __intel_wait_for_register_fw(dev_priv, ...))
DRM_ERROR("FDI mPHY reset assert timeout\n");
I would also let it have a 10ms max timeout - there's no downside. We
didn't before because of the expense of the wait_for() loops, and this
must be a waitable context.
Hmm. We do want __inte_wait_for_register_fw:
might_sleep_if(fast_timeout_us > 10 || slow_timeout_ms);
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list