[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Document code of conduct

[Luc Verhaegen]

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:36:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Luc Verhaegen <libv at skynet.be> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:24:04PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Luc Verhaegen <libv at skynet.be> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:48:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> >> freedesktop.org has adopted a formal&enforced code of conduct:
> >> >>
> >> >> https://www.fooishbar.org/blog/fdo-contributor-covenant/
> >> >> https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/CodeOfConduct/
> >> >>
> >> >> Besides formalizing things a bit more I don't think this changes
> >> >> anything for us, we've already peer-enforced respectful and
> >> >> constructive interactions since a long time. But it's good to document
> >> >> things properly.
> >> >>
> >> >> Note: As Daniel Stone mentioned in the announcement fd.o admins
> >> >> started chatting with the communities their hosting, which includs the
> >> >
> >> > "started" and "chatting"? That is very weakly formulated.
> >>
> >> Intentionally so ...
> >>
> >> >> X.org foundation board, to figure out how to fan out enforcement and
> >> >
> >> > This was not voted upon or even mentioned during the last board meeting.
> >> > And i think the next board meeting is only in 2 days time. As such, this
> >> > seems like it is not something that's officially sanctioned by the X.org
> >> > foundation board, but you sure do try to make it sound like such.
> >>
> >> ... because it is not yet sanctioned by the board in any way. So not
> >> exactly sure where you're reading this into my commit message, because
> >> it wasn't my intention to make it sounds like this is sanctioned by
> >> the xorg board officially, nor did I state that anywhere. I just said
> >> that discussions already started to happen, that's really all there
> >> is.
> >
> > Thanks for making that clear.
> 
> Yeah I understand the confusion, since it wasn't clear that this mail
> was written by me with my drm maintainer hat on, not me in my role as
> xorg bod secretary. Nor me as an intel employee. I should have made
> that clearer.

I was not confused about that, especially since you mentioned the board.
But this clearly was not something already approved by the X.org 
foundation board.

Luc Verhaegen.