[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/meta_test: Add a meta test for sanity checks of CI systems

Petri Latvala petri.latvala at intel.com
Wed Apr 19 09:08:18 UTC 2017


On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 01:11:53PM +0300, Marta Lofstedt wrote:
> The intention of this test is use it to test that the CI system
> that runs IGT is collecting the results correctly.
> 
> For: VIZ-10281
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt at intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/Makefile.sources       |   1 +
>  tests/intel-ci/meta.testlist |   7 +++
>  tests/meta_test.c            | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 153 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tests/intel-ci/meta.testlist
>  create mode 100644 tests/meta_test.c
> 
> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.sources b/tests/Makefile.sources
> index 45c21a0..7fa9b8f 100644
> --- a/tests/Makefile.sources
> +++ b/tests/Makefile.sources
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ TESTS_progs_M = \
>  	template \
>  	vgem_basic \
>  	vgem_slow \
> +	meta_test \
>  	$(NULL)
>  
>  if HAVE_CHAMELIUM
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/meta.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/meta.testlist
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b3e2923
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/meta.testlist
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +igt at meta_test@pass-result
> +igt at meta_test@fail-result
> +igt at meta_test@dmesg-pass
> +igt at meta_test@dmesg-warn
> +igt at meta_test@user-crash
> +igt at meta_test@piglit-timeout
> +igt at meta_test@generate-panic
> diff --git a/tests/meta_test.c b/tests/meta_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8a420ba
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/meta_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2017 Intel Corporation
> + *
> + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
> + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
> + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
> + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
> + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
> + *
> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
> + * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
> + * Software.
> + *
> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
> + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL
> + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
> + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
> + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
> + * IN THE SOFTWARE.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <signal.h>
> +#include "igt.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * The purpose of this test is to test the CI system that we have
> + * for running the tests. The test should generate all possible
> + * exit states for igt tests.
> + *
> + * Possible exit-states of igt tests:
> + * 1. pass - subtest: pass-result
> + * 2. fail - subtest: fail-result
> + * 3. dmesg warn - subtest: dmesg-fail,
> + *      subtest: dmesg-pass is a sanity check for the dmesg-fail.


Add some further explanation here about the purpose and why the test
does what it does: The purpose is to check that certain kernel log
activity gets correctly reported in the test result, and that normal
activity doesn't?


> + * 4. crash - subtest: user-crash
> + * 5. piglit timeout - subtest: piglit-timeout
> + * 6. incomplete - subtest: generate-panic
> + *      NOTE: inorder for this to generate the incomplete state
> + *      the kernel must be configured to reboot on panic.
> + *      NOTE: if the tested CI system have features such as
> + *      PSTORE and/or kexec/kdump enabled. This test could be
> + *      used to make sure that the CI system stores the generated
> + *      log/dumps as expected.
> + * 7. incomplete - where user hang is not caught by piglit timeout.
> + *      This would be caught by a user-side softdog daemon,
> + *      such as owatch by ezbench. However, I don't know
> + *      how to trigger this state, so it will not be tested.
> + * 8. incomplete - system requires hard reboot :
> + *      This state could be triggered by calling an evil kernel
> + *      module that was developed hang the system. Such
> + *      a module will not be developed for this purpose,
> + *      so this "exit state" will not be tested.
> + *
> + * TODO: If this test was deployed on a CI system that
> + * was able to pick up testing again after reboot,
> + * such as ezbench, a post-analyze test should be added
> + * that collected and analyzed the result of the tests
> + * run before reboot.
> + */
> +
> +__attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)))
> +static void kmsg(const char *format, ...)
> +#define KERN_EMER"<0>"
> +#define KERN_ALERT"<1>"
> +#define KERN_CRIT"<2>"
> +#define KERN_ERR"<3>"
> +#define KERN_WARNING"<4>"
> +#define KERN_NOTICE"<5>"
> +#define KERN_INFO"<6>"
> +#define KERN_DEBUG"<7>"
> +{


This is valid C and does what you mean, but can you add some
whitespace between the token and the value anyway? :P







> +	va_list ap;
> +	FILE *file;
> +
> +	file = fopen("/dev/kmsg", "w");
> +	if (file == NULL)
> +		return;
> +
> +	va_start(ap, format);
> +	vfprintf(file, format, ap);
> +	va_end(ap);
> +	fclose(file);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_result(bool result)
> +{
> +	igt_assert_eq(result, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_dmesg(bool pass)
> +{
> +	if (pass)
> +		kmsg(KERN_DEBUG "drm: IGT inserted string.");
> +	else
> +		kmsg(KERN_WARNING "drm: IGT inserted string.");
> +}
> +
> +static void test_user_crash(void)
> +{
> +	raise(SIGSEGV);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_piglit_timeout(void)
> +{
> +	sleep(605);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_panic(void)
> +{
> +	system("echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger");
> +}
> +
> +igt_main
> +{
> +
> +	igt_fixture {
> +		igt_skip_on_f(!getenv("IGT_CI_META_TEST"),
> +			      "Only for meta-testing of CI systems");


Add a newline here.





With those,

Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list