[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 03/13] lib/igt_aux: Include unistd.h for gettid() on Android
Arkadiusz Hiler
arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com
Thu Apr 20 10:33:35 UTC 2017
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:23:46PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 03:22:19PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com> wrote:
> >> > We define gettid() using syscall() because glibc does not provide a
> >> > wrapper.
> >> >
> >> > Android's bionic got the syscall covered though.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > lib/igt_aux.h | 5 +++++
> >> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/lib/igt_aux.h b/lib/igt_aux.h
> >> > index e62858e..54b9716 100644
> >> > --- a/lib/igt_aux.h
> >> > +++ b/lib/igt_aux.h
> >> > @@ -43,7 +43,12 @@ extern int num_trash_bos;
> >> > #define NSEC_PER_SEC (1000*USEC_PER_SEC)
> >> >
> >> > /* signal interrupt helpers */
> >> > +#ifdef ANDROID
> >>
> >> Seems like this should be something like HAVE_GETTID, defined by
> >> configure or by android makefiles?
> >
> > Yeah, but that's not that easy (yet) and that's not the only area which
> > would use it - notice the thing with cairo from the cover letter.
> >
> > config.h is generated in a ugly way for Android - lib/Android.mk does
> > that. Also if you ./configure it stops compiling for Android causing
> > confusing error.
> >
> > Whole area could use some heavy reworking.
> >
> > One approach would be to mimic what other projects do:
> >
> > * have config_android.h with set of sane #defines (as environment is
> > more static and there is no ac/am)
> >
> > * don't define HAVE_CONFIG_H and just `-include config_android.h` on...
> > Android
> >
> > * add gettid() discovery via ac for Linux (I don't think that any
> > libc other than bionic wraps that call though)
> >
> >
> > But that would made a whole series.
> > I would like to go with #ifdef ANDROID for now.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> It's just that I cringe seeing #ifdef <ENVIRONMENT> instead of #ifdef
> <FEATURE>, when <ENVIRONMENT> and <FEATURE> are not interchangeable or
> 1:1. For example, glibc might include gettid later.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
I completetly get that, I had mixed feeling adding the ifdef.
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list