[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v4] benchmarks/gem_wsim: Command submission workload simulator

[Chris Wilson]

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:23:27PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> You either want to reset presumed_offset=-1 each time, or better for all
> concerned write the correct address alongside the seqno (which also
> enables NORELOC).
> 
> Delta incoming.

See attached.

Next concern is that I have full rings which implies that we are not
waiting on each batch before resubmitting with a new seqno?

If I throw a assert(!busy(batch_bo)) before the *b->mapped_seqno am I
going to be upset?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-seqno-reloc.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 2677 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20170420/7809c79e/attachment.patch>