[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v4] benchmarks/gem_wsim: Command submission workload simulator
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Apr 20 15:06:03 UTC 2017
On 20/04/2017 15:52, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 01:29:11PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> + wrk->nr_bb[engine]++;
>> +
>> + if (engine == VCS && balance) {
>> + engine = balance(wrk, w);
>> + wrk->nr_bb[engine]++;
>> + b = &w->b[engine - VCS1];
>> +
>> + if (flags & SEQNO)
>> + update_bb_seqno(b, engine,
>> + ++wrk->seqno[engine]);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (w->duration.min != w->duration.max) {
>> + unsigned int d = get_duration(&w->duration);
>> + unsigned long offset;
>> +
>> + offset = ALIGN(b->bb_sz - get_bb_sz(d),
>> + 2 * sizeof(uint32_t));
>> + b->eb.batch_start_offset = offset;
>> + }
>> +
>> + gem_execbuf(fd, &b->eb);
>
> Likely double counting wrk->nr_bb. I suggest placing it next to the
> gem_execbuf().
Just convenience in balancing mode so that nr(VCS) = nr(VCS1) +
nr(VCS2). Also from a different angle, if the sum does not hold, that
means workload had auto-balancing and explicit VCS1/2 batches. It's only
used to print out the stats at the end of the run.
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list