[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Add support for CCS modifiers

[Ben Widawsky]

On 17-08-03 10:08:51, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
>> On 17-08-02 12:14:15, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:14:50AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 17-07-31 10:29:55, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>> > On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 09:25:50AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>>>> > > On 17-07-29 13:53:10, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>>> > > > Hi Ben,
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On 26 July 2017 at 19:08, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
>>>> > > > > +       } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) {
>>>> > > > >                 intel_primary_formats = skl_primary_formats;
>>>> > > > >                 num_formats = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_primary_formats);
>>>> > > > > -               modifiers = skl_format_modifiers;
>>>> > > > > +               if (pipe >= PIPE_C)
>>>> > > > > +                       modifiers = skl_format_modifiers_ccs;
>>>> > > > > +               else
>>>> > > > > +                       modifiers = skl_format_modifiers_noccs;
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Shouldn't that be (pipe < PIPE_C)?
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Cheers,
>>>> > > > Daniel
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Yep. It was wrong in v7 too :/. I have it fixed locally.
>>>> >
>>>> > Shouldn't the igt catch this, or does it not try to exercise all the
>>>> > plane/crtc combos there are?
>>>> > -Daniel
>>>>
>>>> I don't know whether or not IGT should have caught this, but it wouldn't
>>>> have
>>>> because I had been sending these without Ville's patches, so my patches
>>>> alone
>>>> don't even build (since his patches defined the modifiers).
>>>
>>>
>>> You can run igt testcases locally. I expect you to do that, at least for
>>> the stuff you're touching.
>>>
>>> Does this mean there's no igts for this at all?
>>> -Daniel
>>
>>
>> I haven't been running IGT locally, so I don't know if they touch this path.
>> We've done all testing so far with kmscube, X, and weston; then measure the
>> overall bandwidth. In this case, I'd stop testing these since Jason/Daniel
>> took
>> over my other patches. I don't even know how to locally make sure I get a
>> display on pipe C.
>>
>> You could easily make an IGT make sure that you get back the right list of
>> modifiers for a given pipe on a given GEN. Probably should do one.
>
>That's not a terribly interesting testcase (we have none of this kind
>I think). But I thought there was a CCS igt that created some simple
>compressed buffers and tried to display them, and then checked it all
>looked good using crcs, i.e. an actual functional testcase, and that
>should have caught the mislisten on pipe C (if it bothered to test all
>planes that expose the CCS modifier). Iirc Ville had that. We do need
>that for merging the kernel side.
>
>Thanks, Daniel

Yeah, we did have that already - just nothing for blobifiers specifically. It
sounds like igt_ccs is broken at the moment.

>-- 
>Daniel Vetter
>Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
>+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch