[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_busy: Only test against one engine

Arkadiusz Hiler arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com
Fri Aug 4 07:59:00 UTC 2017


On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 07:27:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Back when we used cs flips it made sense to go through different
> engines, since a buffer busy on an engine that we couldnt' use for
> cs flipping ended up in different paths.
> 
> But with atomic we use a worker for all flips, and going through the
> combinatorial growth of engines just wastes precious machine time.
> More so the more modern the platform is.
> 
> Of course gem tests should still do some diagonal testing across all
> engines, but the kms side can afford to be a bit cheaper.
> 
> v2: Make it compile. Oops. Also make sure we don't break
> fast-feedback.testlist.
> 
> Adding a mode where we depend upon all engines isn't really possible,
> because there's only 1 exclusive fence and that's the only thing a
> flip waits for.
> 
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
> Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list