[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] pm_rps: Extended testcases with checking PMINTRMSK register value

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Katarzyna Dec (2017-08-10 14:06:15)
> In addition to checking whether the frequency is in correct range
> for certain scenario, we can also verify whether PM interrupts are
> masked correctly.

What does correctly mean? It was a recommendation not a requirement.

You are checking internal kernel implementation details, just add the
check to our runtime suspend that we have applied the mask (which is a
reasonable check as the rps idling is decoupled from the rps suspend).
-Chris