[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Redo old gmch irq handling (rev2)

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:19:23PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Patchwork (2017-08-18 20:41:45)
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: drm/i915: Redo old gmch irq handling (rev2)
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/26215/
> > State : success
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > Series 26215v2 drm/i915: Redo old gmch irq handling
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/26215/revisions/2/mbox/
> > 
> > Test gem_exec_flush:
> >         Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-uc:
> >                 fail       -> PASS       (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100007
> > Test kms_flip:
> >         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
> >                 skip       -> PASS       (fi-skl-x1585l) fdo#101781
> > 
> > fdo#100007 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100007
> > fdo#101781 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101781
> > 
> > fi-blb-e6850     total:279  pass:224  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:54  time:365s
> > fi-ilk-650       total:279  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:50  time:419s
> > fi-pnv-d510      total:279  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:55  time:527s
> 
> That's a reasonably intensive workout of the interrupt handler. Ironlake
> in particular is pretty bad at seqno coherency. Would like to have had
> the gdg and elk/ctg results, what happened to those?

That's a good question. bwr seems to be missing as well. Tomi?

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC