[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 02/11] tests/perf: add per context filtering test for gen8+
Lionel Landwerlin
lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com
Tue Aug 22 13:11:07 UTC 2017
On 22/08/17 12:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2017-08-22 12:45:47)
>> On 08/08/17 15:21, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>> On 4 August 2017 at 12:20, Lionel Landwerlin
>>> <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com> wrote:
>>>> static void
>>>> @@ -1336,6 +1504,66 @@ print_reports(uint32_t *oa_report0, uint32_t *oa_report1, int fmt)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void
>>>> +print_report(uint32_t *report, int fmt)
>>>> +{
>>> I get an unused warning for this...
>> Useful for really precise debugging. Putting under ifdef
> Does it interfere that much with normal testing, or you could dump extra
> details on unexpected events? If it is useful at some point, you will be
> wishing you had the details from CI. The beauty of igt_debug() (at least
> when --debug is not used by defaul!) is that it does give us the
> portmortem output of the last N lines (where N is ~256?) without
> flooding ourselves with irrelevant messages.
> -Chris
The problem is that we get loooooads of reports.
Most of the time you want to look at the deltas between them (which is
what most igt_debug() are about), only occasionally the actual values
(which is what this function dumps).
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list