[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/23] mm/shmem: introduce shmem_file_setup_with_mnt

[Matthew Auld]

On 23 August 2017 at 23:34, Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 12:31:28 +0300 Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch has been floating around for a while now Acked and without
>> further comments. It is blocking us from merging huge page support to
>> drm/i915.
>>
>> Would you mind merging it, or prodding the right people to get it in?
>>
>> Regards, Joonas
>>
>> On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 19:34 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> > We are planning to use our own tmpfs mnt in i915 in place of the
>> > shm_mnt, such that we can control the mount options, in particular
>> > huge=, which we require to support huge-gtt-pages. So rather than roll
>> > our own version of __shmem_file_setup, it would be preferred if we could
>> > just give shmem our mnt, and let it do the rest.
>
> hm, it's a bit odd.  I'm having trouble locating the code which handles
> huge=within_size (and any other options?).

See here https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/172771/, currently we
only care about huge=within_size.

> What other approaches were considered?

We also tried https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/156528/, where
it was suggested that we mount our own tmpfs instance.

Following from that we now have our own tmps mnt mounted with
huge=within_size. With this patch we avoid having to roll our own
__shmem_file_setup like in
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/163024/.

> Was it not feasible to add i915-specific mount options to
> mm/shmem.c (for example?).

Hmm, I think within_size should suffice for our needs.

>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx