[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Redo old gmch irq handling (rev2)

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:15:39PM +0300, Tomi Sarvela wrote:
> On 21/08/17 15:09, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:19:23PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >> Quoting Patchwork (2017-08-18 20:41:45)
> >>> == Series Details ==
> >>>
> >>> Series: drm/i915: Redo old gmch irq handling (rev2)
> >>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/26215/
> >>> State : success
> >>>
> >>> == Summary ==
> >>>
> >>> Series 26215v2 drm/i915: Redo old gmch irq handling
> >>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/26215/revisions/2/mbox/
> >>>
> >>> Test gem_exec_flush:
> >>>          Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-uc:
> >>>                  fail       -> PASS       (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100007
> >>> Test kms_flip:
> >>>          Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
> >>>                  skip       -> PASS       (fi-skl-x1585l) fdo#101781
> >>>
> >>> fdo#100007 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100007
> >>> fdo#101781 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101781
> >>>
> >>> fi-blb-e6850     total:279  pass:224  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:54  time:365s
> >>> fi-ilk-650       total:279  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:50  time:419s
> >>> fi-pnv-d510      total:279  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:55  time:527s
> >>
> >> That's a reasonably intensive workout of the interrupt handler. Ironlake
> >> in particular is pretty bad at seqno coherency. Would like to have had
> >> the gdg and elk/ctg results, what happened to those?
> > 
> > That's a good question. bwr seems to be missing as well. Tomi?
> 
> For hang reasons, BWR and ELK haven't been part of the Patchwork runs. 
> Added tag to both of them now when the issue is fixed.
> 
> CTG is a laptop, and occasionally stops answering to AC boot. Causes 
> noise, so this hasn't been participating Trybot/Patchwork runs.
> 
> GDG is usually (=always) hanging to igt at drv_hangman@error-state-basic 
> which is one of the first tests run. There hasn't been a reason to keep 
> it in Patchwork/Trybot.
> 
> I can re-run the tests through Patchwork if you want, and you'll get 
> results to at least BWR and ELK.

Please do. More results on affected machines wouldn't hurt.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC