[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 2/7] lib/igt_kms: Fix off-by-one bug on skip of missing pipe

Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com
Thu Aug 31 07:06:32 UTC 2017


Op 31-08-17 om 08:18 schreef Gabriel Krisman Bertazi:
> display->n_pipes is zero-indexed, so N returned in
> igt_display_get_n_pipes is already not a valid pipe.  This patch
> prevents kms_ccs from going nuts when testing the first unxesting pipe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman at collabora.co.uk>
> ---
>  lib/igt_kms.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_kms.c b/lib/igt_kms.c
> index 14e2701c3afd..ce07fcc1fc73 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_kms.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_kms.c
> @@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ void igt_display_require_output_on_pipe(igt_display_t *display, enum pipe pipe)
>  {
>  	igt_output_t *output;
>  
> -	igt_skip_on_f(igt_display_get_n_pipes(display) < pipe,
> +	igt_skip_on_f(igt_display_get_n_pipes(display) <= pipe,
>  		      "Pipe %s does not exist.\n", kmstest_pipe_name(pipe));
>  
>  	for_each_valid_output_on_pipe(display, pipe, output)

I think the original check is correct?

Although it could be inverted to make it more clear, matching the other similar checks in tests/kms_*.c:

igt_skip_on_f(pipe >= igt_display_get_n_pipes(display),

But your change doesn't match what any user of n_pipes in /tests is doing, so I'm afraid I have to NACK. :)

Kind regards,
Maarten



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list