[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/i915/guc: Combine enable_guc_loading|submission modparams
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Dec 1 12:36:06 UTC 2017
Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2017-12-01 10:33:15)
> We currently have two module parameters that control GuC:
> "enable_guc_loading" and "enable_guc_submission". Whenever
> we need submission=1, we also need loading=1. We also need
> loading=1 when we want to want to load and verify the HuC.
>
> Lets combine above module parameters into one "enable_guc"
> modparam. New supported bit values are:
>
> 0=disable GuC (no GuC submission, no HuC)
> 1=enable GuC submission
> 2=enable HuC load
>
> Special value "-1" can be used to let driver decide what
> option should be enabled for given platform based on
> hardware/firmware availability or preference.
>
> Explicit enabling any of the GuC features makes GuC load
> a required step, fallback to non-GuC mode will not be
> supported.
>
> v2: Don't use -EIO
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
> Cc: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 5 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 11 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 2c386c7..9162a60 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -3238,8 +3238,9 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> #define HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv) (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
>
> /* Having a GuC is not the same as using a GuC */
> -#define USES_GUC(dev_priv) (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading)
> -#define USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv) (i915_modparams.enable_guc_submission)
> +#define USES_GUC(dev_priv) (!!(i915_modparams.enable_guc > 0))
> +#define USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv) (!!(i915_modparams.enable_guc & 1))
> +#define USES_HUC(dev_priv) (!!(i915_modparams.enable_guc & 2))
* channelling Joonas
Please use a magic name for each bit and so
#define USE_GUC_SUBMISSION_BIT 0
#define USES_GUC_SUBMISSION (!!(i915_modparams.enable_guc & BIT(USE_GUC_SUBMISSION_BIT)))
Gah, that's so ugly.
or
static inline bool intel_use_guc_submission(void)
{
return i915_modparams.enable_guc & BIT(USE_GUC_SUBMISSION_BIT);
}
which at least stops being so shouty.
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list