[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915: Add more control to wait_for routines

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-12-01 17:55:15)
> Quoting Sean Paul (2017-12-01 17:48:17)
> > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > > The current wait_for() is a little more complicated nowadays (variable
> > > W).
> > >
> > 
> > Hmm, am I based off the wrong tree? I'm using drm-intel-next.
> 
> drm-intel-next is what was sent as a PR; drm-intel-next-queued is always
> current. To be sure CI, doesn't complain about merge conflicts, base on
> drm-tip.

Speaking of CI, do you have any instructions on how we might set up a
test system? Just needs a compatible monitor and some test code?
Could chamelium or something like that be used as a validator?
-Chris