[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/4] tests: Move gem_bad_address to hw-tests

Antonio Argenziano antonio.argenziano at intel.com
Fri Dec 15 19:43:40 UTC 2017



On 13/12/17 05:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Petri Latvala (2017-12-13 12:58:14)
>> Since the test is considered to be HW focused, meaning that it doesn't
>> really exercise the driver but rather an HW feature, it is placed in
>> tests/hw-tests.
> 
> Do we really want to keep this test at all? It's an interesting debate

This test has been around for a long time now so I think keeping it 
around would not be a problem, plus it actually gets fixed in this series.

-Antonio

> whether we want to show how trivial it is to subvert the kernel and HW
> (in some circumstances). > -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list