[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: reorder field in gem_request tracepoints
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Dec 18 13:32:19 UTC 2017
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2017-12-18 12:12:47)
> Let's make the order of the fields of the tracepoints involving gem
> request match across i915. This makes userspace processing of
> tracepoint a bit easier.
>
> Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
We could argue for days upon the preferred ordering of ctx/ring/seqno,
but I think the best compromise is indeed hw_id/ring/ctx/seqno.
I couldn't see any remaining inconsistencies,
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list