[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915/psr: CAN_PSR() macro to check for PSR source and sink support.

Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Tue Dec 19 21:23:46 UTC 2017


On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 05:26:53AM +0000, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> The global variable dev_priv->psr.sink_support is set if an eDP sink
> supports PSR. Use this instead of redoing the check with is_edp_psr().
> Combine source and sink support checks into a macro that can be used to
> return early from psr_{invalidate, single_frame_update, flush}.
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 19 ++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 30f791f89d64..48676e99316e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1760,6 +1760,7 @@ static inline void intel_backlight_device_unregister(struct intel_connector *con
>  
>  
>  /* intel_psr.c */
> +#define CAN_PSR(dev_priv) (HAS_PSR(dev_priv) && dev_priv->psr.sink_support)

not sure about the "CAN"... but I don't have better suggestion and I believe
it is somehow clear enough...

>  void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		      const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>  void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index c4d75e82a1df..76339cf387cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -56,14 +56,6 @@
>  #include "intel_drv.h"
>  #include "i915_drv.h"
>  
> -static bool is_edp_psr(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> -{
> -	if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> -		return false;
> -
> -	return intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] & DP_PSR_IS_SUPPORTED;
> -}

I wonder why we haven't done this before in favor of sink_support///
my bad... 

> -
>  static bool vlv_is_psr_active_on_pipe(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> @@ -358,10 +350,7 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		&crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode;
>  	int psr_setup_time;
>  
> -	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> -		return;
> -
> -	if (!is_edp_psr(intel_dp))
> +	if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv))
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (!i915_modparams.enable_psr) {
> @@ -794,7 +783,7 @@ void intel_psr_single_frame_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	enum pipe pipe;
>  	u32 val;
>  
> -	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> +	if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv))
>  		return;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -843,7 +832,7 @@ void intel_psr_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>  	enum pipe pipe;
>  
> -	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> +	if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv))
>  		return;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> @@ -883,7 +872,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>  	enum pipe pipe;
>  
> -	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> +	if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv))
>  		return;

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>

>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list