[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid setting redundant INIT power domain mask for DC_OFF wells

Pandiyan, Dhinakaran dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com
Tue Dec 19 23:25:22 UTC 2017




On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 14:01 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:52:09PM +0000, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > The POWER_DOMAIN_INIT bit is already set in _POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS,
> > which is included in _DC_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS. So, avoid setting that again
> > in _DC_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS and shuffle the macros a bit to make it easy to
> > notice relation.
> > 
> > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 20 ++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > index 96ab74f3d101..eb4b12989c84 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > @@ -1706,11 +1706,10 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_D_IO) |		\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> >  #define SKL_DISPLAY_DC_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS (		\
> > -	SKL_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS |		\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_GT_IRQ) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A) |			\
> > -	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> > +	SKL_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS)
> >  
> >  #define BXT_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS (		\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A) |		\
> > @@ -1728,12 +1727,6 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_VGA) |				\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> > -#define BXT_DISPLAY_DC_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS (		\
> > -	BXT_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS |		\
> > -	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_GT_IRQ) |			\
> > -	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET) |			\
> > -	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A) |			\
> > -	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> >  #define BXT_DPIO_CMN_A_POWER_DOMAINS (			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_A_LANES) |		\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A) |			\
> > @@ -1744,6 +1737,11 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_B) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_C) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> > +#define BXT_DISPLAY_DC_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS (		\
> > +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_GT_IRQ) |			\
> > +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET) |			\
> > +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A) |			\
> > +	BXT_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS)
> 
> why did you move the entire block below?
> 
Because the DC_OFF domain is at the bottom for every other platform :)

> >  
> >  #define GLK_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS (		\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A) |		\
> > @@ -1788,11 +1786,10 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_C) |		\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> >  #define GLK_DISPLAY_DC_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS (		\
> > -	GLK_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS |		\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_GT_IRQ) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A) |			\
> > -	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> > +	GLK_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS)
> >  
> >  #define CNL_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS (		\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A) |		\
> > @@ -1836,10 +1833,9 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_D) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> >  #define CNL_DISPLAY_DC_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS (		\
> > -	CNL_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS |		\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET) |			\
> >  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A) |			\
> > -	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> > +	CNL_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS)
> >  
> >  static const struct i915_power_well_ops i9xx_always_on_power_well_ops = {
> >  	.sync_hw = i9xx_power_well_sync_hw_noop,
> > -- 
> > 2.11.0
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list