[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/perf_pmu: Verify engine busyness accuracy
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Wed Dec 20 09:48:04 UTC 2017
On 19/12/2017 22:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-12-19 15:45:43)
>> +static void debug_error(const char *str, double val, double ref)
>> +{
>> + igt_debug("%s=%.2f%% (%.2f/%.2f)\n", str, __error(val, ref), val, ref);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void log_error(const char *str, double val, double ref)
>> +{
>> + debug_error(str, val, ref);
>> + igt_info("%s=%.2f%%\n", str, __error(val, ref));
>> +}
>
> Looking at the CI output, these could really do with some explanation.
Yes a very disappointing think to look at in the morning. Much worse
than the previous version which used calibrated batches. While at the
same time new version is much better on my SKL..
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list