[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Tidy up GEM_TRACE around execlists

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Dec 20 12:43:22 UTC 2017


Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-12-20 12:39:42)
> 
> On 20/12/2017 09:06, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Looking at the coordination of resets with the submission of execlists,
> > it will be useful to have a GEM_TRACE for when we issue the reset.
> > Whilst there tidy up the other GEM_TRACE to always include the engine
> > name, and be careful not to trust any pointers prior to asserts.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 6 ++++--
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > index 6205d320b86f..84029806cf3f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static void inject_preempt_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> >       ce->ring->tail &= (ce->ring->size - 1);
> >       ce->lrc_reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL+1] = ce->ring->tail;
> >   
> > -     GEM_TRACE("\n");
> > +     GEM_TRACE("%s\n", engine->name);
> >       for (n = execlists_num_ports(&engine->execlists); --n; )
> >               elsp_write(0, engine->execlists.elsp);
> >   
> > @@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
> >                       GEM_TRACE("%s out[0]: ctx=%d.%d, seqno=%x\n",
> >                                 engine->name,
> >                                 port->context_id, count,
> > -                               rq->global_seqno);
> > +                               rq ? rq->global_seqno : 0);
> 
> rq can be NULL here? What's with the --count below then, wouldn't it 
> underflow since I assume rq == NULL means count == 0 as well?

Exactly. If rq is NULL then count must be 0. However, we want to show the
output from before the BUG_ON so that we have it available in case the
BUG does explode.
-Chris


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list