[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1½ 03/13] drm/i915/dp: rename rate_to_index() to intel_dp_find_rate() and reuse

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 01 Feb 2017, "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 21:44 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Rename the function, move it at the top, and reuse in
>> intel_dp_link_rate_index(). If there was a reason in the past to use
>> reverse search order here, there isn't now.
>> 
>> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 33 ++++++++++++++-------------------
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index 1d66737a3a0f..f3068ff670a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -266,6 +266,17 @@ static int intersect_rates(const int *source_rates, int source_len,
>>  	return k;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int intel_dp_find_rate(const int *rates, int len, int rate)
>
> I wonder if the function name can be more intuitive. The argument is
> rate and the function name indicates it also returns rate. I can't tell
> what the function does by it's name. Feel free to ignore this comment as
> I might be missing some context.

Naming is hard. intel_dp_rate_index?

BR,
Jani.


>
> -DK
>
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>> +		if (rate == rates[i])
>> +			return i;
>> +
>> +	return -1;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  				 int *common_rates)
>>  {
>> @@ -284,15 +295,10 @@ static int intel_dp_link_rate_index(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  				    int *common_rates, int link_rate)
>>  {
>>  	int common_len;
>> -	int index;
>>  
>>  	common_len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp, common_rates);
>> -	for (index = 0; index < common_len; index++) {
>> -		if (link_rate == common_rates[common_len - index - 1])
>> -			return common_len - index - 1;
>> -	}
>>  
>> -	return -1;
>> +	return intel_dp_find_rate(common_rates, common_len, link_rate);
>>  }
>>  
>>  int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> @@ -1542,17 +1548,6 @@ bool intel_dp_read_desc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  	return true;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static int rate_to_index(const int *rates, int len, int rate)
>> -{
>> -	int i;
>> -
>> -	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>> -		if (rate == rates[i])
>> -			return i;
>> -
>> -	return -1;
>> -}
>> -
>>  int
>>  intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  {
>> @@ -1568,8 +1563,8 @@ intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  
>>  int intel_dp_rate_select(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int rate)
>>  {
>> -	int i = rate_to_index(intel_dp->sink_rates, intel_dp->num_sink_rates,
>> -			      rate);
>> +	int i = intel_dp_find_rate(intel_dp->sink_rates,
>> +				   intel_dp->num_sink_rates, rate);
>>  
>>  	if (WARN_ON(i < 0))
>>  		i = 0;
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center