[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Deconstruct execute fence

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Feb 2 15:13:03 UTC 2017


On reflection, we are only using the execute fence as a waitqueue on the
global_seqno and not using it for dependency tracking between fences
(unlike the submit and dma fences). By only treating it as a waitqueue,
we can then treat it similar to the other waitqueues durin submit,
making the code simpler.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 47 +++++++--------------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h | 10 +------
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
index e4eeb5f5453c..e385d0c3c890 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ static void i915_fence_release(struct dma_fence *fence)
 	 * caught trying to reuse dead objects.
 	 */
 	i915_sw_fence_fini(&req->submit);
-	i915_sw_fence_fini(&req->execute);
 
 	kmem_cache_free(req->i915->requests, req);
 }
@@ -211,7 +210,6 @@ static void i915_gem_request_retire(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&request->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_signaled(&request->submit));
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_signaled(&request->execute));
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_request_completed(request));
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!request->i915->gt.active_requests);
@@ -422,7 +420,7 @@ void __i915_gem_request_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
 	list_move_tail(&request->link, &timeline->requests);
 	spin_unlock(&request->timeline->lock);
 
-	i915_sw_fence_commit(&request->execute);
+	wake_up_all(&request->execute);
 }
 
 void i915_gem_request_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
@@ -457,24 +455,6 @@ submit_notify(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, enum i915_sw_fence_notify state)
 	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
-static int __i915_sw_fence_call
-execute_notify(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, enum i915_sw_fence_notify state)
-{
-	struct drm_i915_gem_request *request =
-		container_of(fence, typeof(*request), execute);
-
-	switch (state) {
-	case FENCE_COMPLETE:
-		break;
-
-	case FENCE_FREE:
-		i915_gem_request_put(request);
-		break;
-	}
-
-	return NOTIFY_DONE;
-}
-
 /**
  * i915_gem_request_alloc - allocate a request structure
  *
@@ -567,13 +547,7 @@ i915_gem_request_alloc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 
 	/* We bump the ref for the fence chain */
 	i915_sw_fence_init(&i915_gem_request_get(req)->submit, submit_notify);
-	i915_sw_fence_init(&i915_gem_request_get(req)->execute, execute_notify);
-
-	/* Ensure that the execute fence completes after the submit fence -
-	 * as we complete the execute fence from within the submit fence
-	 * callback, its completion would otherwise be visible first.
-	 */
-	i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(&req->execute, &req->submit, &req->execq);
+	init_waitqueue_head(&req->execute);
 
 	i915_priotree_init(&req->priotree);
 
@@ -1015,6 +989,7 @@ long i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
 		TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE : TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
 	wait_queue_head_t *errq = &req->i915->gpu_error.wait_queue;
 	DEFINE_WAIT(reset);
+	DEFINE_WAIT(exec);
 	struct intel_wait wait;
 
 	might_sleep();
@@ -1036,12 +1011,11 @@ long i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
 	if (flags & I915_WAIT_LOCKED)
 		add_wait_queue(errq, &reset);
 
-	if (!i915_sw_fence_done(&req->execute)) {
-		DEFINE_WAIT(exec);
-
+	reset_wait_queue(&req->execute, &exec);
+	if (!req->global_seqno) {
 		do {
-			prepare_to_wait(&req->execute.wait, &exec, state);
-			if (i915_sw_fence_done(&req->execute))
+			set_current_state(state);
+			if (req->global_seqno)
 				break;
 
 			if (flags & I915_WAIT_LOCKED &&
@@ -1059,15 +1033,14 @@ long i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
 
 			timeout = io_schedule_timeout(timeout);
 		} while (timeout);
-		finish_wait(&req->execute.wait, &exec);
+		finish_wait(&req->execute, &exec);
 
 		if (timeout < 0)
 			goto complete;
 
-		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_done(&req->execute));
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!req->global_seqno);
 	}
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_done(&req->submit));
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!req->global_seqno);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_signaled(&req->submit));
 
 	/* Optimistic short spin before touching IRQs */
 	if (i915_spin_request(req, state, 5))
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
index 9049936c571c..467d3e13fce0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
@@ -119,18 +119,10 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_request {
 	 * The submit fence is used to await upon all of the request's
 	 * dependencies. When it is signaled, the request is ready to run.
 	 * It is used by the driver to then queue the request for execution.
-	 *
-	 * The execute fence is used to signal when the request has been
-	 * sent to hardware.
-	 *
-	 * It is illegal for the submit fence of one request to wait upon the
-	 * execute fence of an earlier request. It should be sufficient to
-	 * wait upon the submit fence of the earlier request.
 	 */
 	struct i915_sw_fence submit;
-	struct i915_sw_fence execute;
 	wait_queue_t submitq;
-	wait_queue_t execq;
+	wait_queue_head_t execute;
 
 	/* A list of everyone we wait upon, and everyone who waits upon us.
 	 * Even though we will not be submitted to the hardware before the
-- 
2.11.0



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list