[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/13] drm/i915/dp: use known correct array size in rate_to_index

[Jani Nikula]

I can't think of a real world bug this could cause now, but this will be
required in follow-up work. While at it, change the parameter order to
be slightly more sensible.

Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 2ab0192595c2..3b809b6d186d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -1542,12 +1542,12 @@ bool intel_dp_read_desc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static int rate_to_index(int find, const int *rates)
+static int rate_to_index(const int *rates, int len, int rate)
 {
-	int i = 0;
+	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES; ++i)
-		if (find == rates[i])
+	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+		if (rate == rates[i])
 			break;
 
 	return i;
@@ -1568,7 +1568,8 @@ intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 
 int intel_dp_rate_select(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int rate)
 {
-	return rate_to_index(rate, intel_dp->sink_rates);
+	return rate_to_index(intel_dp->sink_rates, intel_dp->num_sink_rates,
+			     rate);
 }
 
 void intel_dp_compute_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int port_clock,
-- 
2.1.4