[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915/perf: fix gen7_append_oa_reports comment
Robert Bragg
robert at sixbynine.org
Mon Feb 13 14:36:47 UTC 2017
If I'm going to complain about a back-to-front convention then the least
I can do is not muddle the comment up too.
Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <robert at sixbynine.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index a1b7eec58be2..b0eec762b9b4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
* userspace.
*
* Note: reports are consumed from the head, and appended to the
- * tail, so the head chases the tail?... If you think that's mad
+ * tail, so the tail chases the head?... If you think that's mad
* and back-to-front you're not alone, but this follows the
* Gen PRM naming convention.
*
--
2.11.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list