[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Prevent divide-by-zero in debugfs/i915_rps_boost_info

[Chris Wilson]

Either by chance, or by misread, the current evaluation interval may be
zero. If that is the case, don't divide by it!

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 124213a36b4f..c0bc922fe497 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -2367,10 +2367,10 @@ static int i915_rps_boost_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 		seq_printf(m, "\nRPS Autotuning (current \"%s\" window):\n",
 			   rps_power_to_str(dev_priv->rps.power));
 		seq_printf(m, "  Avg. up: %d%% [above threshold? %d%%]\n",
-			   100 * rpup / rpupei,
+			   rpup && rpupei ? 100 * rpup / rpupei : 0,
 			   dev_priv->rps.up_threshold);
 		seq_printf(m, "  Avg. down: %d%% [below threshold? %d%%]\n",
-			   100 * rpdown / rpdownei,
+			   rpdown && rpdownei ? 100 * rpdown / rpdownei : 0,
 			   dev_priv->rps.down_threshold);
 	} else {
 		seq_puts(m, "\nRPS Autotuning inactive\n");
-- 
2.11.0