[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Include GuC fw version in error state
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Feb 24 10:49:46 UTC 2017
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:43:32AM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:13:29AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:13:05AM +0530, Kamble, Sagar A wrote:
> > > Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble [1]<sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
> > >
> > > On 2/24/2017 4:41 AM, Michel Thierry wrote:
> > >
> > > There was no way to check if the platform is running the latest firmware.
> > >
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin [2]<tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler [3]<arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry [4]<michel.thierry at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > index 2b1d15668192..e022187916ee 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > @@ -632,6 +632,16 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
> > > CSR_VERSION_MINOR(csr->version));
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv)) {
> > > + struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.fw;
> > > +
> > > + err_printf(m, "GuC loaded: %s\n",
> > > + yesno(guc_fw->load_status ==
> > > + INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS));
> > > + err_printf(m, "GuC fw version: %d.%d\n",
> > > + guc_fw->major_ver_found, guc_fw->minor_ver_found);
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > Hmm. The firmware may change between the hang and cat
> > /sys/class/drm/card0/error (as it will be reloaded after the reset).
>
> Btw, maybe we should add counter that will be incremented on each fw reload
> and reported here ?
If it occurs to you that we need it for post-mortem debugging and having
it is worth more than any potential confusion....
I can see the need for knowing what guc/huc/dmc/etc was running at the
time of a hang - I just hope that what was previously running before an
earlier reset doesn't contribute. But that's why we focus on the first
error in a system...
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list