[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Include GuC fw version in error state

[Michel Thierry]

On 2/24/2017 2:40 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:11:37PM -0800, Michel Thierry wrote:
>> There was no way to check if the platform is running the latest firmware.
>
> Can we also add similar patch for the HuC ?
>

Please don't tell me the HuC can hang the gpu too.

>>
>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
>> index 2b1d15668192..e022187916ee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
>> @@ -632,6 +632,16 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
>>  			   CSR_VERSION_MINOR(csr->version));
>>  	}
>>
>> +	if (HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv)) {
>> +		struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.fw;
>
> I would preffer to use HAS_GUC and intel_guc* here.
>
>
>> +
>> +		err_printf(m, "GuC loaded: %s\n",
>> +			   yesno(guc_fw->load_status ==
>> +				 INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS));
>
> Hmm, as we do have more detailed load status, why limiting it to yes/no only?
>
>
> -Michal
>
>> +		err_printf(m, "GuC fw version: %d.%d\n",
>> +			   guc_fw->major_ver_found, guc_fw->minor_ver_found);
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	err_printf(m, "EIR: 0x%08x\n", error->eir);
>>  	err_printf(m, "IER: 0x%08x\n", error->ier);
>>  	for (i = 0; i < error->ngtier; i++)
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx