[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop support for I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_* execbuf parameters.
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Feb 24 17:53:37 UTC 2017
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:34:46AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0
> (indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf
> always return -EINVAL if the flags are used.
>
> Apparently, no userspace ever shipped which used this optional feature:
> I checked the git history of Mesa, xf86-video-intel, libva, and Beignet,
> and there were zero commits showing a use of these flags. Kernel commit
> 72bfa19c8deb4 apparently introduced the feature prematurely. According
> to Chris, the intention was to use this in cairo-drm, but "the use was
> broken for gen6", so I don't think it ever happened.
>
> 'relative_constants_mode' has always been tracked per-device, but this
> has actually been wrong ever since hardware contexts were introduced, as
> the INSTPM register is saved (and automatically restored) as part of the
> render ring context. The software per-device value could therefore get
> out of sync with the hardware per-context value. This meant that using
> them is actually unsafe: a client which tried to use them could damage
> the state of other clients, causing the GPU to interpret their BO
> offsets as absolute pointers, leading to bogus memory reads.
>
> These flags were also never ported to execlist mode, making them no-ops
> on Gen9+ (which requires execlists), and Gen8 in the default mode.
>
> On Gen8+, userspace can write these registers directly, achieving the
> same effect. On Gen6-7.5, it likely makes sense to extend the command
> parser to support them. I don't think anyone wants this on Gen4-5.
>
> Based on a patch by Dave Gordon.
>
> v3: Return -ENODEV for the getparam, as this is what we do for other
> obsolete features. Suggested by Chris Wilson.
>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92448
> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com> [v2]
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> [v2]
Acked by Daniel (irc), so scrubbed from the history books.
Thanks for the patch,
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list