[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Never suspend i2c-busses used for accessing the system PMIC

[Wolfram Sang]

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:25:01AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:38:29 +0100,
> Hans de Goede wrote:
> > 
> > index a8e74ca..a4ac473 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
> > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
> >   * @pm_qos: pm_qos_request used while holding a hardware lock on the bus
> >   * @acquire_lock: function to acquire a hardware lock on the bus
> >   * @release_lock: function to release a hardware lock on the bus
> > - * @pm_runtime_disabled: true if pm runtime is disabled
> > + * @pm_disabled: true if power-management should be disabled for this i2c-bus
> >   *
> >   * HCNT and LCNT parameters can be used if the platform knows more accurate
> >   * values than the one computed based only on the input clock frequency.
> > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct dw_i2c_dev {
> >  	struct pm_qos_request	pm_qos;
> >  	int			(*acquire_lock)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
> >  	void			(*release_lock)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
> > -	bool			pm_runtime_disabled;
> > +	bool			pm_disabled;
> >  	bool			dynamic_tar_update_enabled;
> 
> I couldn't find this dynamic_tar_update_enabled field in your previous
> patchset.  What am I missing?

It got reverted with 12688dc21f71f4 ("Revert "i2c: designware: detect
when dynamic tar update is possible"") around 4.10-rc7 time.

I also wondered that Hans didn't get a merge conflict somewhere.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20170227/0c49cedf/attachment.sig>