[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't use enums for hardware engine id

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue Feb 28 21:53:37 UTC 2017


On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 07:07:38PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:52:34PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:43:02PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 02:12:09PM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> > > > +/* Hardware Engine ID definitions */
> > > > +#define RCS_HW		0
> > > > +#define VCS_HW		1
> > > > +#define BCS_HW		2
> > > > +#define VECS_HW		3
> > > > +#define VCS2_HW		4
> > > 
> > > So don't put them in the header if they may have inconsistent meanings.
> > 
> > Or if you do want to keep them in a header, either i915_reg.h or
> > intel_engine_reg.h as somewhere out of the way, and clear that they are
> > not meant for the rest of the bookkeeping in intel_ringbuffer.h.
> 
> I can't find nice spot for these engine IDs in the i915_reg.h
> 
> Can I just move these definitions to the top of this header?

I would rather we spend a little effort on splitting our driver API from
hw innards.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list