[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 5/6] i2c: designware-baytrail: Fix race when resetting the semaphore
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Mon Jan 2 10:06:57 UTC 2017
On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 10:55 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02-01-17 10:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, 2017-01-01 at 21:15 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Use iosf_mbi_modify instead of iosf_mbi_read + iosf_mbi_write so
> > > that
> > > we keep the iosf_mbi_lock locked during the read-modify-write done
> > > to
> > > reset the semaphore.
> > >
> >
> > While patch itself looks good to me, I think it reduces a
> > probability to
> > race and doesn't eliminate an issue completely.
>
> All accesses through this register are done through the
> iosf_mbi_ helpers, and the modify helper holds the
> iosf_mbi_lock during the entire read-modify-wrtie cycle,
> so I don't see how there can still be any issue left.
Ah, seems you are right.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
>
> > Can you check i915 code
> > how it's done there?
>
> AFAIK the i915 code never takes the pmic i2c bus semaphore.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> p.s.
>
> Since you're interested in this set, you may also be interested
> in this RFC patch-set:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg115833.html
>
>
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v5:
> > > -New patch in v5 of this patch-set
> > > ---
> > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c | 11 ++---------
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
> > > b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
> > > index 650a700..8df529c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
> > > @@ -47,15 +47,8 @@ static int get_sem(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, u32
> > > *sem)
> > >
> > > static void reset_semaphore(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
> > > {
> > > - u32 data;
> > > -
> > > - if (iosf_mbi_read(BT_MBI_UNIT_PMC, MBI_REG_READ,
> > > PUNIT_SEMAPHORE, &data)) {
> > > - dev_err(dev->dev, "iosf failed to reset punit
> > > semaphore during read\n");
> > > - return;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - data &= ~PUNIT_SEMAPHORE_BIT;
> > > - if (iosf_mbi_write(BT_MBI_UNIT_PMC, MBI_REG_WRITE,
> > > PUNIT_SEMAPHORE, data))
> > > + if (iosf_mbi_modify(BT_MBI_UNIT_PMC, MBI_REG_READ,
> > > PUNIT_SEMAPHORE,
> > > + 0, PUNIT_SEMAPHORE_BIT))
> > > dev_err(dev->dev, "iosf failed to reset punit
> > > semaphore during write\n");
> > >
> > > pm_qos_update_request(&dev->pm_qos,
> > > PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE);
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list