[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/psr: fix blank screen issue for psr2
Vivi, Rodrigo
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Jan 5 20:41:45 UTC 2017
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 00:55 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
> psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
> PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
> (psr1 control register)is set to 0.
> Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
> instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
> in blankscreen.
> hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
> hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
> as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
>
> v2: (Vivi Rodrigo)
> - Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 00970aa..7830e6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -3615,6 +3615,9 @@ enum {
> #define EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU_MASK (0xf<<4)
> #define EDP_PSR2_IDLE_MASK 0xf
>
> +#define EDP_PSR2_STATUS_CTL _MMIO(0x6f940)
> +#define EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK (0xf<<28)
> +
> /* VGA port control */
> #define ADPA _MMIO(0x61100)
> #define PCH_ADPA _MMIO(0xe1100)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index c3aa649..d5e8bcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -261,12 +261,11 @@ static void vlv_psr_activate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> VLV_EDP_PSR_ACTIVE_ENTRY);
> }
>
> -static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +static void intel_enable_source_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> -
> uint32_t max_sleep_time = 0x1f;
> /*
> * Let's respect VBT in case VBT asks a higher idle_frame value.
> @@ -312,14 +311,30 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL;
>
> I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val);
> +}
>
> - if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
> - return;
> +static void intel_enable_source_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> + struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> +
> + /*
> + * Let's respect VBT in case VBT asks a higher idle_frame value.
> + * Let's use 6 as the minimum to cover all known cases including
> + * the off-by-one issue that HW has in some cases. Also there are
> + * cases where sink should be able to train
> + * with the 5 or 6 idle patterns.
> + */
> + uint32_t idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
> + uint32_t val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
> +
> + val |= idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
>
> /* FIXME: selective update is probably totally broken because it doesn't
> * mesh at all with our frontbuffer tracking. And the hw alone isn't
> * good enough. */
> - val = EDP_PSR2_ENABLE | EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE;
> + val |= EDP_PSR2_ENABLE | EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE;
>
> if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 5)
> val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_2500;
> @@ -333,6 +348,20 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR2_CTL, val);
> }
>
> +
> +static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> + struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> +
> + /* psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive.*/
> + if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
> + intel_enable_source_psr2(intel_dp);
> + else
> + intel_enable_source_psr1(intel_dp);
> +}
> +
> static bool intel_psr_match_conditions(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> @@ -410,7 +439,10 @@ static void intel_psr_activate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>
> - WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> + if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
> + WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL) & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE);
> + else
> + WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> WARN_ON(dev_priv->psr.active);
> lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>
> @@ -462,8 +494,6 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits = 0;
>
> if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> - hsw_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp);
> -
> if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> /* PSR2 is restricted to work with panel resolutions upto 3200x2000 */
> if (crtc->config->pipe_src_w > 3200 ||
> @@ -471,8 +501,10 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = false;
> else
> skl_psr_setup_su_vsc(intel_dp);
> + } else {
> + /* set up vsc header for psr1 */
> + hsw_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp);
This might fail if psr2_support = false 2 lines above happens...
So code will continue on psr1 without any vsc setup.
This logic needs to be reworked.
Or probably the psr2 check and restriction properly moved to
match_conditions function, where is the right place for all conditional
behavior checking. (Preferably in a separated patch before this one).
> }
> -
> /*
> * Per Spec: Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking MEMUP and HPD.
> * Also mask LPSP to avoid dependency on other drivers that
> @@ -557,20 +589,37 @@ static void hsw_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>
> if (dev_priv->psr.active) {
> - I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL,
> - I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & ~EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> + if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
> + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR2_CTL,
> + I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL) &
> + ~(EDP_PSR2_ENABLE |
> + EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE));
> + else
> + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL,
> + I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & ~EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
>
> /* Wait till PSR is idle */
> - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> - EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL,
> - EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
> - 0,
> - 2000))
> + if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> + if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> + EDP_PSR2_STATUS_CTL,
> + EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
> + 0,
> + 2000))
> + DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR2 Idle State\n");
> + } else {
> + if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> + EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL,
> + EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
> + 0,
> + 2000))
> DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle State\n");
> -
> + }
> dev_priv->psr.active = false;
> } else {
> - WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> + if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
> + WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL) & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE);
> + else
> + WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> }
All these 40 lines above deserve separated functions as well.
or at least invert the checks first psr2 then active... better for
reading one or another imo..
> }
>
> @@ -621,13 +670,24 @@ static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
> * and be ready for re-enable.
> */
> if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> - if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> - EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL,
> - EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
> - 0,
> - 50)) {
> - DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n");
> - return;
> + if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> + if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> + EDP_PSR2_STATUS_CTL,
> + EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
> + 0,
> + 50)) {
> + DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR2 Idle for re-enable\n");
> + return;
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> + EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL,
> + EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
> + 0,
> + 50)) {
> + DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n");
> + return;
> + }
> }
> } else {
> if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> @@ -669,11 +729,15 @@ static void intel_psr_exit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> return;
>
> if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> - val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL);
> -
> - WARN_ON(!(val & EDP_PSR_ENABLE));
> -
> - I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val & ~EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> + if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> + val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL);
> + WARN_ON(!(val & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE));
> + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR2_CTL, val & ~EDP_PSR2_ENABLE);
> + } else {
> + val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL);
> + WARN_ON(!(val & EDP_PSR_ENABLE));
> + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val & ~EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> + }
> } else {
> val = I915_READ(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe));
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list