[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/psr: enable psr2 for y cordinate panels

Vivi, Rodrigo rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Fri Jan 6 17:37:41 UTC 2017


I was going to write the rv-b,
but something came to my mind...

In this case where y_cord_support but we don't have gtc yet, couldn't we
enable PSR1 instead?
in this case instead of return false we would do
dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = false;

what do you think/advise?

On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 23:01 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> Psr2 is enabled only for y cordinate panels.Once GTC (global time code)
> is implemented,this restriction is removed so that psr2
> can work on panels without y cordinate support.
> 
> v2: (Rodrigo)
> - Move the check to intel_psr_match_conditions
> 
> v3: (Rodrigo)
> - add return false
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 05efd4e..fc32b04 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -433,6 +433,15 @@ static bool intel_psr_match_conditions(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		return false;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * FIXME:enable psr2 only for y-cordinate psr2 panels
> +	 * After gtc implementation , remove this restriction.
> +	 */
> +	if (!dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support &&  dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 disabled, panel does not support Y coordinate\n");
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
>  	dev_priv->psr.source_ok = true;
>  	return true;
>  }



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list