[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/37] drm/i915: Simple selftest to exercise live requests
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Jan 12 12:10:08 UTC 2017
On 11/01/2017 21:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Just create several batches of requests and expect it to not fall over!
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_request.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_request.c
> index f348f5f81351..63e69d360764 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_request.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
> *
> */
>
> +#include <linux/prime_numbers.h>
> +
> #include "i915_selftest.h"
>
> #include "mock_gem_device.h"
> @@ -155,3 +157,79 @@ int i915_gem_request_mock_selftests(void)
>
> return err;
> }
> +
> +static int live_nop_request(void *arg)
> +{
> + I915_SELFTEST_TIMEOUT(end_time);
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> + unsigned int reset_count = i915_reset_count(&i915->gpu_error);
> + unsigned long n, prime;
> + ktime_t times[2] = {};
> + int err;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> +
> + err = i915_gem_wait_for_idle(i915, I915_WAIT_LOCKED);
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("Failed to idle GPU before %s\n", __func__);
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + i915->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings = 0;
> +
> + for_each_prime_number_from(prime, 1, 8192) {
Feels like an overuse of primes. Wouldn't an exponential sequence make
more sense here? Like 1, 10, 100, 1000, if not even 100 would be enough.
Also since it is a live test, might be cool to loop over the engines.
> + times[1] = ktime_get_raw();
> +
> + for (n = 0; n < prime; n++) {
> + request = i915_gem_request_alloc(i915->engine[RCS],
> + i915->kernel_context);
> + if (IS_ERR(request)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(request);
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + i915_add_request(request);
> + }
> + i915_wait_request(request, I915_WAIT_LOCKED, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> + times[1] = ktime_sub(ktime_get_raw(), times[1]);
> + if (prime == 1)
> + times[0] = times[1];
> +
> + if (time_after(jiffies, end_time)) {
> + pr_warn("%s timed out: last batch size %lu\n",
> + __func__, prime);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (reset_count != i915_reset_count(&i915->gpu_error)) {
> + pr_err("GPU was reset %d times!\n",
> + i915_reset_count(&i915->gpu_error) - reset_count);
> + err = -EIO;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + if (i915->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings) {
> + pr_err("Missed interrupts on rings %lx\n",
> + i915->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings);
> + err = -EIO;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + pr_info("Request latencies: 1 = %lluns, %lu = %lluns\n",
> + ktime_to_ns(times[0]),
> + prime, div64_u64(ktime_to_ns(times[1]), prime));
> +
> +out_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +int i915_gem_request_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
> + SUBTEST(live_nop_request),
> + };
> + return i915_subtests(tests, i915);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> index f3e17cb10e05..09bf538826df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
> * Tests are executed in order by igt/drv_selftest
> */
> selftest(sanitycheck, i915_live_sanitycheck) /* keep first (igt selfcheck) */
> +selftest(requests, i915_gem_request_live_selftests)
>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list