[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm: Add definitions for DP compliance Video pattern tests
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Fri Jan 20 15:33:51 UTC 2017
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com> wrote:
> v3:
> * Fix the conventions in bit definitions (Jani Nikula)
> v2:
> * Add all the other DP Complianec TEST register defs (Jani Nikula)
> Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> ---
> include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> index 0468135..7ab4153 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -417,6 +417,70 @@
> #define DP_TEST_LANE_COUNT 0x220
>
> #define DP_TEST_PATTERN 0x221
> +# define DP_NO_TEST_PATTERN 0x0
> +# define DP_COLOR_RAMP 0x1
> +# define DP_BLACK_AND_WHITE_VERTICAL_LINES 0x2
> +# define DP_COLOR_SQUARE 0x3
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_H_TOTAL_HI 0x222
> +#define DP_TEST_H_TOTAl_LO 0x223
^
Sorry, didn't notice it before, but the l in TOTAL is lower case.
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_V_TOTAL_HI 0x224
> +#define DP_TEST_V_TOTAl_LO 0x225
^
Ditto.
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_H_START_HI 0x226
> +#define DP_TEST_H_START_LO 0x227
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_V_START_HI 0x228
> +#define DP_TEST_V_START_LO 0x229
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_HSYNC_HI 0x22A
> +# define DP_TEST_HSYNC_POLARITY (1 << 7)
> +# define DP_TEST_HSYNC_WIDTH_HI_MASK (127 << 0)
> +#define DP_TEST_HSYNC_WIDTH_LO 0x22B
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_VSYNC_HI 0x22C
> +# define DP_TEST_VSYNC_POLARITY (1 << 7)
> +# define DP_TEST_VSYNC_WIDTH_HI_MASK (127 << 0)
> +#define DP_TEST_VSYNC_WIDTH_LO 0x22D
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_H_WIDTH_HI 0x22E
> +#define DP_TEST_H_WIDTH_LO 0x22F
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_V_HEIGHT_HI 0x230
> +#define DP_TEST_V_HEIGHT_LO 0x231
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_MISC0 0x232
> +# define DP_TEST_SYNC_CLOCK (1 << 0)
> +# define DP_CLOCK_ASYNC 0x0
> +# define DP_CLOCK_SYNC 0x1
The above two are not necessary.
> +# define DP_TEST_COLOR_FORMAT_MASK (3 << 1)
> +# define DP_TEST_COLOR_FORMAT_SHIFT 1
> +# define DP_COLOR_FORMAT_RGB (0 << 1)
> +# define DP_COLOR_FORMAT_YCbCr422 (1 << 1)
> +# define DP_COLOR_FORMAT_YCbCr444 (2 << 1)
> +# define DP_TEST_DYNAMIC_RANGE (1 << 3)
I'd just name this DP_TEST_DYNAMIC_RANGE_CEA...
> +# define DP_VESA_RANGE (0 << 3)
> +# define DP_CEA_RANGE (1 << 3)
...and drop these two. But whatever.
> +# define DP_TEST_YCBCR_COEFFICIENTS (1 << 4)
> +# define DP_YCBCR_COEFFICIENTS_ITU601 (0 << 4)
> +# define DP_YCBCR_COEFFICIENTS_ITU709 (1 << 4)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_MASK (7 << 5)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_SHIFT 5
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_6 (0 << 5)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_8 (1 << 5)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_10 (2 << 5)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_12 (3 << 5)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_16 (4 << 5)
Blank line here.
> +#define DP_TEST_MISC1 0x233
> +# define DP_TEST_REFRESH_DENOMINATOR (1 << 0)
> +# define REFRESH_DENOMINATOR_1 0x0
> +# define REFRESH_DENOMINATOR_1_001 0x1
DP_ prefix.
> +# define DP_TEST_INTERLACED (1 << 1)
> +# define DP_NON_INTERLACED (0 << 1)
> +# define DP_INTERLACED (1 << 1)
No need for these two. DP_TEST_INTERLACED is sufficient.
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_REFRESH_RATE_NUMERATOR 0x234
>
> #define DP_TEST_CRC_R_CR 0x240
> #define DP_TEST_CRC_G_Y 0x242
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list