[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Move breadcrumbs irq_posted up a level to engine
Mika Kuoppala
mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Tue Jan 24 15:45:30 UTC 2017
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> In the next patch, we will use the irq_posted technique for another
> engine interrupt, rather than use two members for the atomic updates, we
> can use two bits of one instead. First, we need to update the
> breadcrumbs to use the new common engine->irq_posted.
>
> v2: Use set_bit() rather than __set_bit() to ensure atomicity with
> respect to other bits in the mask
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com
Missing '>' in the end of line
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 9 ++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 4 +++-
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index ccb4fb804fca..652e40c6ca40 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -3964,7 +3964,7 @@ __i915_request_irq_complete(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> */
> if (engine->irq_seqno_barrier &&
> rcu_access_pointer(engine->breadcrumbs.irq_seqno_bh) == current &&
> - cmpxchg_relaxed(&engine->breadcrumbs.irq_posted, 1, 0)) {
> + test_and_clear_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted)) {
> struct task_struct *tsk;
>
> /* The ordering of irq_posted versus applying the barrier
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 6fefc34ef602..7e087c344265 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ static void ironlake_rps_change_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> static void notify_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> - smp_store_mb(engine->breadcrumbs.irq_posted, true);
> + set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted);
> if (intel_engine_wakeup(engine))
> trace_i915_gem_request_notify(engine);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> index c6fa77177615..6b24f2544b6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void irq_enable(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> * we still need to force the barrier before reading the seqno,
> * just in case.
> */
> - engine->breadcrumbs.irq_posted = true;
> + set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted);
>
> /* Caller disables interrupts */
> spin_lock(&engine->i915->irq_lock);
> @@ -95,8 +95,6 @@ static void irq_disable(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> spin_lock(&engine->i915->irq_lock);
> engine->irq_disable(engine);
> spin_unlock(&engine->i915->irq_lock);
> -
> - engine->breadcrumbs.irq_posted = false;
> }
>
> static void __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
> @@ -257,7 +255,8 @@ static bool __intel_engine_add_wait(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> * in case the seqno passed.
> */
> __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(b);
> - if (READ_ONCE(b->irq_posted))
> + if (test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB,
> + &engine->irq_posted))
> wake_up_process(to_wait(next)->tsk);
> }
>
> @@ -610,7 +609,7 @@ void intel_engine_reset_breadcrumbs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> if (intel_engine_has_waiter(engine)) {
> b->timeout = wait_timeout();
> __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(b);
> - if (READ_ONCE(b->irq_posted))
> + if (test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted))
> wake_up_process(b->first_wait->tsk);
> } else {
> /* sanitize the IMR and unmask any auxiliary interrupts */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index dbd32585f27a..a9ea84ea3155 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -211,6 +211,9 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
>
> struct intel_render_state *render_state;
>
> + unsigned long irq_posted;
> +#define ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB 0
> +
> /* Rather than have every client wait upon all user interrupts,
> * with the herd waking after every interrupt and each doing the
> * heavyweight seqno dance, we delegate the task (of being the
> @@ -229,7 +232,6 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
> */
> struct intel_breadcrumbs {
> struct task_struct __rcu *irq_seqno_bh; /* bh for interrupts */
> - bool irq_posted;
>
> spinlock_t lock; /* protects the lists of requests; irqsafe */
> struct rb_root waiters; /* sorted by retirement, priority */
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list