[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/9] drm: Add driver private objects to atomic state

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Thu Jan 26 08:40:07 UTC 2017

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:33:16PM -0500, Harry Wentland wrote:
> On 2017-01-25 12:59 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 03:49:32PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> >> +struct drm_private_state_funcs {
> > 
> > I also wonder whether we shouldn't give this a drm_atomic_ prefix ...
> I think leaving the atomic prefix out is more consistent with the other
> atomic state objects (drm_crtc_state, etc). drm_xyz_state seems to apply
> atomic.
> I don't have a strong preference either way, though.

Yeah, makes sense ... I suggested the atomic prefix since it's (at least
right now) only used for atomic updates. But just calling them
drm_private_{state,obj} makes sense too.
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation

More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list