[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Make intel_detect_preproduction_hw easier to extend

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:50:28PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> As we add new generations, we should keep detecting new system
> development platforms that were temporarily enabled (via
> "i915.alpha_support") and now superseded by production systems. To make
> it easier to add more platforms, split the if into a series of logical
> operations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 008fc1e62a69..c2c210b0f47f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -782,8 +782,12 @@ static void i915_workqueues_cleanup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   */
>  static void intel_detect_preproduction_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	if (IS_HSW_EARLY_SDV(dev_priv) ||
> -	    IS_SKL_REVID(dev_priv, 0, SKL_REVID_F0))
> +	bool sdv = false;

Presumably not all SDVs use pre-production silicon, so the name of
this variable feels a bit off. Also since it doesn't actually check
anything about the actual board we can't even say that it's an
actual SDV, so the HSW_EARLY_SDV() macro seems somewhat poorly named
to me as well.

> +
> +	sdv |= IS_HSW_EARLY_SDV(dev_priv);
> +	sdv |= IS_SKL_REVID(dev_priv, 0, SKL_REVID_F0);
> +
> +	if (sdv)
>  		DRM_ERROR("This is a pre-production stepping. "
>  			  "It may not be fully functional.\n");
>  }
> -- 
> 2.11.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC