[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1½ 05/13] drm/i915/dp: generate and cache sink rate array for all DP, not just eDP 1.4

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri Jan 27 17:28:47 UTC 2017


On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:44:19PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> There is some conflation related to sink rates, making this change more
> complicated than it would otherwise have to be. There are three changes
> here that are rather difficult to split up:
> 
> 1) Use the intel_dp->sink_rates array for all DP, not just eDP 1.4. We
>    initialize it from DPCD on eDP 1.4 like before, but generate it based
>    on DP_MAX_LINK_RATE on others. This reduces code complexity when we
>    need to use the sink rates; they are all always in the sink_rates
>    array.
> 
> 2) Update the sink rate array whenever we read DPCD, and use the
>    information from there. This increases code readability when we need
>    the sink rates.
> 
> 3) Disentangle fallback rate limiting from sink rates. In the code, the
>    max rate is a dynamic property of the *link*, not of the *sink*. Do
>    the limiting after intersecting the source and sink rates, which are
>    static properties of the devices.
> 
> This paves the way for follow-up refactoring that I've refrained from
> doing here to keep this change as simple as it possibly can.
> 
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c               | 76 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c |  3 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h              |  4 +-
>  3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index cc2523363c8d..d13ce6746542 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,34 @@ static void vlv_steal_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
>  				      enum pipe pipe);
>  static void intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  
> +static int intel_dp_num_rates(u8 link_bw_code)
> +{
> +	switch (link_bw_code) {
> +	default:
> +		WARN(1, "invalid max DP link bw val %x, using 1.62Gbps\n",
> +		     link_bw_code);
> +	case DP_LINK_BW_1_62:
> +		return 1;
> +	case DP_LINK_BW_2_7:
> +		return 2;
> +	case DP_LINK_BW_5_4:
> +		return 3;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/* update sink rates from dpcd */
> +static void intel_dp_set_sink_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> +	int i, num_rates;
> +
> +	num_rates = intel_dp_num_rates(intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE]);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_rates; i++)
> +		intel_dp->sink_rates[i] = default_rates[i];
> +
> +	intel_dp->num_sink_rates = num_rates;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  intel_dp_max_link_bw(struct intel_dp  *intel_dp)
>  {
> @@ -205,19 +233,6 @@ intel_dp_downstream_max_dotclock(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	return max_dotclk;
>  }
>  
> -static int
> -intel_dp_sink_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, const int **sink_rates)
> -{
> -	if (intel_dp->num_sink_rates) {
> -		*sink_rates = intel_dp->sink_rates;
> -		return intel_dp->num_sink_rates;
> -	}
> -
> -	*sink_rates = default_rates;
> -
> -	return (intel_dp->max_sink_link_bw >> 3) + 1;
> -}
> -
>  static void
>  intel_dp_set_source_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
> @@ -285,15 +300,22 @@ static int intel_dp_find_rate(const int *rates, int len, int rate)
>  static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  				 int *common_rates)
>  {
> -	const int *sink_rates;
> -	int sink_len;
> +	int max_rate = drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(intel_dp->max_sink_link_bw);
> +	int i, common_len;
>  
> -	sink_len = intel_dp_sink_rates(intel_dp, &sink_rates);
> +	common_len = intersect_rates(intel_dp->source_rates,
> +				     intel_dp->num_source_rates,
> +				     intel_dp->sink_rates,
> +				     intel_dp->num_sink_rates,
> +				     common_rates);
>  
> -	return intersect_rates(intel_dp->source_rates,
> -			       intel_dp->num_source_rates,
> -			       sink_rates, sink_len,
> -			       common_rates);
> +	/* Limit results by potentially reduced max rate */
> +	for (i = 0; i < common_len; i++) {
> +		if (common_rates[common_len - i - 1] <= max_rate)
> +			return common_len - i;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int intel_dp_link_rate_index(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> @@ -1501,8 +1523,7 @@ static void snprintf_int_array(char *str, size_t len,
>  
>  static void intel_dp_print_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
> -	const int *sink_rates;
> -	int sink_len, common_len;
> +	int common_len;
>  	int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
>  	char str[128]; /* FIXME: too big for stack? */
>  
> @@ -1513,8 +1534,8 @@ static void intel_dp_print_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  			   intel_dp->source_rates, intel_dp->num_source_rates);
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("source rates: %s\n", str);
>  
> -	sink_len = intel_dp_sink_rates(intel_dp, &sink_rates);
> -	snprintf_int_array(str, sizeof(str), sink_rates, sink_len);
> +	snprintf_int_array(str, sizeof(str),
> +			   intel_dp->sink_rates, intel_dp->num_sink_rates);
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("sink rates: %s\n", str);
>  
>  	common_len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp, common_rates);
> @@ -1580,7 +1601,8 @@ int intel_dp_rate_select(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int rate)
>  void intel_dp_compute_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int port_clock,
>  			   uint8_t *link_bw, uint8_t *rate_select)
>  {
> -	if (intel_dp->num_sink_rates) {
> +	/* eDP 1.4 rate select method. */
> +	if (is_edp(intel_dp) && intel_dp->edp_dpcd[0] >= 0x03) {

I was convinced that this wasn't a mandatory feature, but the spec does
seem to say "The table must contain at least one non-zero value at the
first (lowest DPCD address) location."

But given historical evidence I'm still 99% convinced we'll eventually
run into some panel somewhere that does this wrong, so I don't really
like this idea.

>  		*link_bw = 0;
>  		*rate_select =
>  			intel_dp_rate_select(intel_dp, port_clock);
> @@ -3713,6 +3735,8 @@ intel_edp_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  			intel_dp->sink_rates[i] = (val * 200) / 10;
>  		}
>  		intel_dp->num_sink_rates = i;
> +	} else {
> +		intel_dp_set_sink_rates(intel_dp);
>  	}
>  
>  	return true;
> @@ -3725,6 +3749,8 @@ intel_dp_get_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	if (!intel_dp_read_dpcd(intel_dp))
>  		return false;
>  
> +	intel_dp_set_sink_rates(intel_dp);
> +
>  	if (drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SINK_COUNT,
>  			     &intel_dp->sink_count, 1) < 0)
>  		return false;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> index 0048b520baf7..694ad0ffb523 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		link_config[1] |= DP_LANE_COUNT_ENHANCED_FRAME_EN;
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux, DP_LINK_BW_SET, link_config, 2);
>  
> -	if (intel_dp->num_sink_rates)
> +	/* eDP 1.4 rate select method. */
> +	if (!link_bw)
>  		drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux, DP_LINK_RATE_SET,
>  				  &rate_select, 1);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index f132d4aea1ad..b914dd543362 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -933,8 +933,8 @@ struct intel_dp {
>  	/* source rates */
>  	int num_source_rates;
>  	const int *source_rates;
> -	/* sink rates as reported by DP_SUPPORTED_LINK_RATES */
> -	uint8_t num_sink_rates;
> +	/* sink rates as reported by DP_MAX_LINK_RATE/DP_SUPPORTED_LINK_RATES */
> +	int num_sink_rates;
>  	int sink_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
>  	/* Max lane count for the sink as per DPCD registers */
>  	uint8_t max_sink_lane_count;
> -- 
> 2.1.4

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list