[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915/perf: fix gen7_append_oa_reports comment

Robert Bragg robert at sixbynine.org
Fri Jan 27 17:42:01 UTC 2017

If I'm going to complain about a back-to-front convention then the least
I can do is not muddle the comment up too.

Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <robert at sixbynine.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index a1b7eec58be2..b0eec762b9b4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
  * userspace.
  * Note: reports are consumed from the head, and appended to the
- * tail, so the head chases the tail?... If you think that's mad
+ * tail, so the tail chases the head?... If you think that's mad
  * and back-to-front you're not alone, but this follows the
  * Gen PRM naming convention.

More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list